Question 9: CCAR-P: Claude Certified Architect - Professional
You are reviewing a peer’s draft system prompt that contains contradictory instructions - one section says to never speculate beyond the supplied source, and another says to confidently fill in any gaps. Which response is most appropriate?
Nội dung câu hỏi
You are reviewing a peer’s draft system prompt that contains contradictory instructions - one section says to never speculate beyond the supplied source, and another says to confidently fill in any gaps. Which response is most appropriate?
Các lựa chọn
Đáp án được giữ gọn theo nhãn A, B, C, D trong phần bình chọn tương tác.
- A. Add a priority-ordering instruction that tells the model to evaluate all available instructions and apply the most contextually appropriate one on each request.
- B. Increase the temperature setting so that output randomness masks the contradictions.
- C. Resolve the contradiction by removing or rewording the gap-filling instruction so the prompt consistently constrains the model to source-supported content. — đáp án hiện tại
- D. Keep both contradictory instructions in place and rely on the model to select which one to follow on each individual request, accepting inconsistent behavior as a result.
Answer researched independently against supporting documentation; not a published source answer key. Independent reasoning (not a published answer key): Removing contradictory gap-filling instructions creates a consistent grounding policy. References: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/prompt-engineering/claude-prompting-best-practices https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/test-and-evaluate/strengthen-guardrails/reduce-hallucinations
Cộng đồng
0 bình luận công khai. Tên thành viên được ẩn một phần.