Câu 154: NSE4-5.4: Fortinet Network Security Expert - FortiOS 5.4
Examine the exhibit; then answer the question below. The Vancouver FortiGate initially had the following information in its routing table:S 172.20.0.0/16 [10/0] via 172.21.1.2, port2C 172.21.0.0/16 is directly connected, port2C 172.11.11.0/24 is directly connected, port1Afterwards, the following static route was added…
Nội dung câu hỏi
Examine the exhibit; then answer the question below. The Vancouver FortiGate initially had the following information in its routing table:S 172.20.0.0/16 [10/0] via 172.21.1.2, port2C 172.21.0.0/16 is directly connected, port2C 172.11.11.0/24 is directly connected, port1Afterwards, the following static route was added: Since this change, the new static route is NOT showing up in the routing table. Given the information provided, which of the following describes the cause of this problem?
Các lựa chọn
Đáp án được giữ gọn theo nhãn A, B, C, D trong phần bình chọn tương tác.
- A. The subnet 172.20.1.0/24 is overlapped with the subnet of one static route that is already in the routing table (172.20.0.0/16), so, we need to enable allow- subnet-overlap first.
- B. The 'gateway' IP address is NOT in the same subnet as the IP address of port1. — đáp án hiện tại
- C. The priority is 0, which means that the route will remain inactive.
- D. The static route configuration is missing the distance setting.
Cộng đồng
0 bình luận công khai. Tên thành viên được ẩn một phần.