CertyRush
Đang tải...
C CertyRush
Câu hỏi free preview

Câu 19: GMAT Section 3: Verbal Ability

For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose…

Nội dung câu hỏi

For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists. The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?

Các lựa chọn

Đáp án được giữ gọn theo nhãn A, B, C, D trong phần bình chọn tương tác.

  1. A. Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.
  2. B. Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.
  3. C. Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers. — đáp án hiện tại
  4. D. Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.
  5. E. A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.

Cộng đồng

0 bình luận công khai. Tên thành viên được ẩn một phần.

Chưa có bình luận. Mở giao diện tương tác để bắt đầu thảo luận.

Câu hỏi liền kề