Câu 17: LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning

Forty years ago, hardly anybody thought about going to court to sue somebody. A person could bump a pedestrian with his Chrysler Airflow and the victim would say something like, "No harm done," and walk away. Ipso facto. No filing of codicils, taking of depositions or polling the jury. Attorneys need not apply. Which one of the following sentences most logically continues the above passage?

1. A. The Chrysler Airflow is no longer the harmless machine it used to be.
2. B. Fortunately, this is still the case.
3. C. Unfortunately, times have changed. — đáp án hiện tại
4. D. New legislation affecting the necessity for codicils is a sign of the times.
5. E. But now, as we know, law schools are full of eager young people.