Câu 31: LSAT Test: Law School Admission Test: Logical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension, Analytical Reasoning

The regulation that is proposed for dental insurance will contribute only small assistance to patients in the reduction of costs for regular dental car. Although, the bill does limit the amount the dentist can charge for a regular visit, it does not limit the expense amount that they can charge if a patient is in need of a special procedure, and it doesn't place any limits on the amount of times that the dentist may see a patient for the same occurring problem. This being the case, instead of the patient being charged once, the dentist can bill the patient numerous times, and the total costs will not reduce. The above argument is opposed to the new legislation based on:

1. A. Identifying a loophole in the regulation proposal that allows dentists to charge patients the same amount of money on a continuing basis. — đáp án hiện tại
2. B. Implication that the regulation of dental care is impossible.
3. C. The suggestion that procedures which are specialized are frequently done when a simple less-expensive procedure would work equally as well.
4. D. The suggestion that regular dental visits are much more expensive than specialized procedures.
5. E. The suggestion that patients cannot distinguish between what appropriate dental care expenses are for any known dental problem.